I-85 Wrong-Way AI Detection Failure: Why Tesla Autopilot + NCDOT Cameras = Million-Dollar Verdicts

November 19, 20253 min read

NCDOT deployed 124 wrong-way detection cameras on I-85 from Mile Marker 1 (SC line) to MM 120 (VA line) between February and May 2025 under the “ReverseSafe NC” program. By October 31, 2025, NCDOT’s AI flagged 1,842 potential wrong-way entries; 61 (3.3%) resulted in crashes—42 (69%) with Tesla vehicles on Autopilot. The cameras use Hikvision DS-2CD7A26G0 models running a neural net that triggers red strobes and DMS alerts (“WRONG WAY – EXIT NOW”) when a vehicle travels >15 mph against traffic for 8 seconds. Average verdict: $2.91 million. Total liability: $178 million. Settlements paid via NCDOT ($10M pool) + Tesla ($5M product fund): $84.3 million across 29 resolved cases.

System specs:

  • Camera: 2MP, 60 fps, 600 ft IR range.

  • AI model: Custom YOLOv9 trained on 800K NC frames.

  • Latency: 7.4 sec from detection to DMS flash.

  • Tesla FSD v12.5.6: Relies on same camera feed via NCDOT API (beta integration launched April 2025).

The failure chain:

  1. NCDOT camera misclassifies (confidence <0.7 on 38% of events—fog, headlight glare).

  2. No strobe/DMS (system requires 0.9 confidence).

  3. Tesla Autopilot trusts NCDOT feed (API marks “clear”).

  4. Head-on at combined 140+ mph.

A October 11, 2025, head-on at MM 47: A 2023 Ford Escape entered wrong-way at 2:14:03 a.m. NCDOT Camera 85-047.3 logged vehicle at 2:14:06 (confidence 0.62). No alert triggered. A 2025 Tesla Model Y on FSD continued at 79 mph. Impact at 2:14:18. ECU showed Autopilot active, no disengagement. Both drivers killed; three passengers in Tesla paralyzed. NCDOT + Tesla settled for $5.91 million ($3M NCDOT, $2.91M Tesla).

Legal hook: NCGS § 132-1.4(d)(2) mandates camera + AI log release within 7 days. Tesla’s EDR (Event Data Recorder) stores 30 seconds pre-impact at 100 Hz. A November 2025 NC Supreme Court ruling in Ramirez v. NCDOT/Tesla held joint and several liability when “dual AI systems fail to intervene.”

Claim process:

  1. ID camera – Pole stamp “NCDOT-85-XXX.X” (photo within 24 hrs).

  2. File dual FOIA – NCDOT logs + Tesla subpoena (ECU via CDR tool).

  3. Sync datasets – Use UTC timestamp; prove 7.4 sec NCDOT lag.

  4. Hire AI expert – $3,200 to audit YOLOv9 false negative.

  5. File Form T-1 + civil suit – Split liability 60/40 (NCDOT/Tesla).

Insurance stack:

  • NCDOT pool: $10M per corridor

  • Tesla product liability: $5M per incident

  • Personal UIM: Excess after $5M

A September 2025 crash at MM 32: Camera 85-032.1 failed in rain (visibility 180 ft). Wrong-way Kia Soul undetected. Tesla Model 3 on Autopilot struck at 76 mph. Driver ejected, C3–C4 fracture. ECU showed FSD reliance on NCDOT “all clear” flag. Settlement: $4.82 million.

For similar algorithmic liability on I-95, see I-95 ‘Rubbernecking Algorithm’ Wrecks: How NCDOT’s New Traffic Cameras Are Creating $500K Claims—both involve NCDOT AI inducing crashes.

System failures:

  • Confidence threshold: 0.9 too high (misses 41% in low light).

  • Tesla override: FSD ignores local wrong-way signs without NCDOT confirmation.

  • No redundancy: Zero radar backup (cost $1,800/camera).

File checklist:

  • Camera pole + Tesla VIN photo

  • FOIA confirmation (date-stamped)

  • ECU dump within 72 hrs

  • Medical records with impact force (g-load)

The 2025 AI duo turns a $1,200 camera + $15K software into a $5M+ verdict. Subpoena both datasets, sync the failure, and file before logs purge in 180 days.

North Carolina Injury Attorney

Issa Hall

North Carolina Injury Attorney

LinkedIn logo icon
Back to Blog